Nasdaq-Listed Crypto Firm Sued, Accused of Defrauding Investors With Fake Bitcoin Mining Business

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against a Nasdaq-listed bitcoin mining company. The suit cites a document claiming that the industry is “totally inaccurate,” with nonexistent bitcoin mining operations.

Lawsuit Alleges Crypto Firm’s Bitcoin Mining Commerce Is ‘Fully Fraudulent’

A class-action lawsuit used to be filed on Wednesday in the Southern District Court docket of New York against Bit Digital Inc., its CEO Min Hu, and CFO Erke Huang.


Bit Digital, a preserving company listed on Nasdaq under the logo BTBT, purports to seize in bitcoin mining industry thru its U.S. and Hong Kong subsidiaries. Its name used to be changed from Golden Bull Ltd. (ticker DNJR) in September 2020.

The lawsuit cites a document by J Capital Research released on Jan. 11 alleging that Bit Digital operates “a inaccurate cryptocurrency industry,” which is “designed to comprehend funds from investors.”

J Capital alleges that Bit Digital’s claim that “it used to be working 22,869 bitcoin miners in China” is “simply no longer that probabilities are you’ll per chance well per chance per chance imagine.” The analysis firm stated that it had “verified with native governments supposedly internet hosting the BTBT mining operation that there must always no longer any bitcoin miners there,” adding:

We deem the bitcoin industry BTBT discloses is totally inaccurate.

Plaintiff Anthony Pauwels, for my fragment and on behalf of all others who bought Bit Digital securities between Dec. 21, 2020, and Jan. 8, accuses the defendants of violating the federal securities prison guidelines. They acknowledged that the defendants “made materially inaccurate and/or misleading statements, besides to didn’t show topic fabric harmful info about the corporate’s industry, operations, and potentialities.”

Following the newsletter of J Capital’s document, “Bit Digital’s stock note fell $6.27 per piece, or 25%, to discontinuance at $18.76 per piece on January 11, 2021, on surprisingly heavy trading quantity,” the lawsuit particulars.

Native Chinese language Authorities No longer the least bit Heard of the Company

Bit Digital had beforehand declared, “Our mining operations are in Wuhai, Zhundong, Xinlinhot and Sichuan, China.”

J Capital defined that “In China, it be foremost to register with the authorities to non-public an data middle, and native governments non-public records of all data facilities and bitcoin mining operations.” The analysis firm extra illustrious that “with out a Chinese language-registered entity, that would possibly perchance per chance well no longer be fantastic.” Moreover, “Corporations are required to display a registration document from a home fantastic entity sooner than they’ll signal a lease or a internet hosting contract. Yet the corporate clearly claims that it both operates and leases mining facilities in China.”

To envision Bit Digital’s claims, J Capital contacted the governments of these areas. “In phone calls, native authorities officers of each locality advised us they had no bitcoin mining operations and had no longer heard of Bit Digital,” J Capital described.

An legitimate of Zhundong advised J Capital: “Enormous data, cryptocurrency, cloud computing parks or data facilities — none of these non-public registered right here.” An legitimate of Xilinhot also confirmed, “There is not very this kind of thing as a bitcoin middle right here.” In an analogous style, an legitimate of Wuhai advised J Capital:

There’s no bitcoin middle right here. I’ve never heard of Bit Digital.

Mining Rig Producers Additionally ‘Drew a Easy’

To envision that Bit Digital had the bitcoin miners it claims, J Capital acknowledged it spoke with “the total predominant manufacturers in China of bitcoin mining instruments” but “None had heard of BTBT.”

An employee of Microbt, a mining rig manufacturer from which BTBT acknowledged it supplied 21,713 machines in 2020, advised J Capital that BTBT had no longer bought instruments from them. “I have not heard of Bit Digital,” he acknowledged. “We supplied the name of the corporate’s aged VIE with out a better result,” J Capital clarified.

Bit Digital also acknowledged that it supplied 256 miners from Bitmain in the first nine months of 2020. Nonetheless, J Capital acknowledged that Bitmain “drew a clean” when inquired about BTBT.

Bit Digital Claims Inaccurate Accusations

Bit Digital Inc. answered to the accusations on Tuesday, claiming that they are inaccurate. “Since we never bought any designate new miners from suppliers in 2020 they’d no longer know of the corporate or of its subsidiaries,” the corporate claims. Bit Digital additionally affirmed that, as disclosed in its third-quarter monetary results on Dec. 18, 2020, it owned 40,865 bitcoin miners.

As effectively as, the corporate acknowledged: “Now we non-public no longer signed leases for bitcoin mining facilities. In squawk to scheme decrease utility charges, the mining facilities are maintained by our third-celebration suppliers … The bitcoin mining facilities in China are maintained by Hong Kong suppliers.” Furthermore, Bit Digital defined that it bought Xmax Hong Kong, and “The total bitcoin mining operations in mainland China are conducted by Xmax Hong Kong.”

The plaintiff and the category are hunting for “compensatory damages,” “cheap charges and charges incurred on this action, including counsel charges and expert charges,” and “Such different and extra relief because the court docket would possibly perchance per chance well honest deem fantastic and fantastic.”

What originate you deem about Bit Digital’s mining operations? Allow us to know in the feedback half under.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Tackle Bitcoin without visiting a cryptocurrency change. Pick BTC and BCH right here.

Disclaimer: This text is for informational functions supreme. It is no longer an instantaneous offer or solicitation of a advice to make a decision or sell, or a advice or endorsement of any products, services, or corporations. doesn’t present investment, tax, fantastic, or accounting advice. Neither the corporate nor the author is to blame, suddenly or by hook or by crook, for any destroy or loss precipitated or alleged to be precipitated by or in reference to the employ of or reliance on any jabber material, goods or services mentioned listed right here.

Leave a comment